I recently read an article in Glamour Magazine regarding the importance of getting any unusual spots checked for cancer. They run this article or something similar every year around this time. They say that this article has helped many women identify potential cancerous spots. It is extremely informative regarding the types of spots to look for, etc., however, I have an issue with the assertion that the sun is the cause of skin cancer.
The sun is natural; it’s been around since the beginning of time. We NEED the sun; without it we would cease to exist. The sun’s rays allow our bodies to produce much needed vitamin D which helps us absorb calcium and also prevents many diseases. I feel it is extremely contradictory that something that is so good for us and absolutely necessary could also be so bad as to cause a potentially fatal illness.
While I do believe that everything should be had in moderation and that anything to an extreme could be harmful I have serious doubts that the sun is actually causing the cancer. I agree that getting burned by the sun is probably not healthy and I could buy into the notion that having severe sunburn could possibly increase the odds of skin cancer. I haven’t yet seen any data that points to how this would happen but with a good argument I could stand behind that. Perhaps the sunburn makes the skin more vulnerable allowing an external toxin to cause the cancer. I don’t know but I know there must be a reason the odds of getting skin cancer are increased after having been sunburned. This still doesn’t tell me that the sun actually causes the cancer. I don’t believe the sun is a carcinogen and if it is I’m not sure how that was ever proven. I get the whole "radiation" argument and the sun's rays being a form of radiation but still, the sun is necessary and life-giving.
The article states that “…the number of young women diagnosed with basal cell carcinoma has more than doubled over the past 30 years.” This is attributed to the use of tanning beds; however, I wonder if it could possibly have anything to do with the increased use of sunscreen.
The Glamour article also states that you can get cancer on your palms and the soles of your feet. I’m confused. If the sun is causing the skin cancer, how can the soles of your feet get it from the sun? How often do the soles of your feet see the sun? I would venture that it’s extremely rare. I also don't see most people walking around all day with their palms facing out or up. In fact, I can't remember the last time I witnessed that. The palms are, however, the one part of the body that is exposed to every, single product we use on ourselves from shaving cream to body lotion to shampoo.
It should be a well-known fact that women, since the beginning of time, have been sunning themselves. I recall my mother telling me that she’d become (much) tanned every summer because of all the time she spent outside. I’m fairly certain that she wasn’t using sunscreen in the 1940s. Bathing suits have been in existence for decades, yet the number of young women with basal cell carcinoma has more than doubled over the past 30 years? I hear the argument of young women using tanning beds clearly more than women 30 years ago (were there tanning beds in the 80s? I think so but maybe not as prevalent? Who knows?) but I also know that the awareness campaigns about their supposed danger have been highly pushed over the past twenty to thirty years also. To me this would suggest that many more women are aware of their perceived dangers and are either avoiding them altogether or avoiding them as well as slathering on the sunscreen.
I just don’t buy the argument that the sun causes skin cancer. I also believe that because the sun is necessary and healthy it doesn’t cause any type of cancer at all. I’m not saying that women should lie outside all day long getting fried I’m just saying that I don’t believe the sun is the villain that it has been made out to be. As I stated earlier, I feel that anything to an extreme could be “bad” and therefore I feel that the sun, in moderation, is not and is in fact a good thing. In fact I recall learning this in a toxicology class I took in college - that anything in the right quantities can be toxic. Fair enough. But is it really fair to place all the blame on the sun? I really don't think so.
Okay then, if that is the case then what IS causing the skin cancer? Could it possibly be the sunscreen itself? Could it be the product(s) that is being recommended to prevent the thing that is actually causing the thing? The article, “Sunscreen Causes Cancer!” actually states this as fact and corroborates this postulation. Additionally the article “Sunblock Can Actually Increase Your Cancer Risk” discusses a link between the food we eat and skin cancer. Both articles provide viable arguments and we all know that nutrition affects every aspect of our health.
Then, after the question from a friend and subsequent research, I found out that most sunscreens contain Oxybenzone, which is also known as Benzophenone-3. Not only has it been linked to allergies, hormone disruption and cell damage (http://www.vivawoman.net/2008/04/10/avoid-sunscreens-containing-oxybenzone/) it is potentially a photocarcinogen (Wikepedia). This means that if so, when exposed to the sun, the sunscreen actually becomes a carcinogen! Does that make any sense at all? Push a product on people under the pretense that it prevents cancer only it actually CAUSES cancer!
Most Glamour articles contain suggestions/recommendations for specific brands of products relating to the topics discussed within their articles. I went back to that article to find out what, exactly, they were recommending as “good” products to use for sun protection. They recommended three different products – one “for face”, one “for every day” and one “for beach days”. After Googling these products and searching the Skin Deep Cosmetic Safety Database I found that all three contain Oxybenzone and therefore all three are probably more detrimental to a person’s health than the “protection” they are claiming to provide. The cosmetic database rates the products on a scale from 0 to 10 – zero being non-hazardous and ten having the most hazards. The products ranked 0 – 2 are recommended for use, those ranked 3 – 6 should be used with caution and those ranked 7 – 10 should be avoided. All three of the products recommended by Glamour had high hazard ratings ranging from 8 to 10.
It would stand to reason that topical application products could be the culprit for skin cancer if it is also found on the palms and soles of the feet. I’ve read several articles and have heard references to studies of products that are now being found to be the cause of several illnesses and problems, particularly in women. The skin, being one large organ, is very porous. According to aforementioned Natural News article, anything that is absorbed by the skin makes its way to the bloodstream fairly quickly. For this reason it is important to limit the toxins and chemicals used on the skin in the form of beauty products. As it states, you shouldn’t put on your skin anything that you wouldn’t eat.
The bottom line is that the sun is necessary, without it we would die. In fact, it has been reported that many illnesses that people are suffering today are a direct result from vitamin D deficiency. It is recommended that everyone spend at least 15 minutes a day out in the sun while exposing as much skin as possible so that the body can produce the necessary vitamin D. This means no sunscreen. Sunscreen blocks the necessary rays that allow the body to produce the necessary D. There are many articles that point to this. My logic tells me that the sun is not the cause of skin cancer. Perhaps, in large doses and after having severe sunburns it triggers the negative effects of an outside toxin. I haven’t read information from any such study but that is something I could understand; however, it would take quite a bit for me to ever believe that the sun, in and of itself, actually causes any form of cancer.
I still believe that if you choose to spend hours in the sun you should use some sort of protection either in the form of a hat, long sleeved shirt, and/or non-hazardous sunscreen, which does exist. Burning is never good. After researching a variety of products, I found that several do not contain harmful chemicals. I recommend a variety of products that I have researched and have listed on my web page http://www.marciemartinez.ws/skincare. I have included several options for non-hazardous sunscreen for those times when you have to be out in the sun longer than 15 minutes. You will also find other useful information regarding natural health and alternative products and treatments for various issues by browsing my web site. Please bear with me as I'm still populating my site with my recommendations but I believe you will find the information I've provided so far to be useful.
Until next time have a fabulous week and enjoy the warm sun…in moderation!
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
The Master Cleanse Part II
For this week’s blog I had planned on moving on to a new pharmaceutical; however, after I posted my last blog on the Master Cleanse I got into a lengthy discussion/debate with a friend of mine. I felt it would be beneficial and important to share that discussion with you so that you can see the other side of the argument.
It’s no secret that many people in the medical field are not in agreement with cleansing for health. I felt that posting the comments (and my responses) to my friend’s discussion would be beneficial to my readers because she is someone I hold in high regard not only because of her intelligence but also her knowledge on the subject – she is a Research Dietitian. I also want to emphasize the importance of diet and exercise with regards to health. She also emphasizes this and therefore I think it drives home the point that all health advocates (traditional/conventional and natural/homeopathic) stress the importance of diet and exercise.
I do not want to detract from the discussion on the cleanse but I do think it is necessary to leave in our comments on vaccinations to understand the context in which they were used. With that said, below is the discussion verbatim with my additional comments in brackets and italics.I added this information after the fact to provide more information on my position. Feel free to comment and add your own experiences and expertise as you see fit.
After posting my blog, the first comment from my friend began with this:
Friend: Probably worth checking this out http://www.todaysdietitian.com/newarchives/tdmay2008pg34.shtml.
My response: I've read pages and pages of people "trying to help" by saying cleansing is bad for you. I don't buy it. My logic tells me our bodies aren't digesting properly due to our diets. I've done an extreme cleanse 5 times and have only gotten positive outcomes. I do agree that the particular cleanse I do is not for everyone but that's why I recommend that anyone interested read the books on the subject. [And although I say it’s not for everyone, I believe there are only a small few that don’t benefit]
Friend: My only problem is that the science doesn't support it....and being in research, I tend to support that school of thought. The first step to improving your health is to change your diet. Your body is designed to digest a mixture of foods while your liver does the detox. Best way to keep both your digestive tract and liver healthy is to consume your vegetables and fruit…and your whole grains and fluid. There is nothing wrong with the food supply, only the choices we make in nourishing our bodies. [I would have to differ here because I believe our food supply gets worse every year. I believe that people with a decent income have access to high quality food in our country but most people don’t have a decent income and/or their money is already spoken-for. With the increase of feedlots and the use of pesticides, our food supply is becoming more and more harmful] But you’re right, it is an individual choice.
Me: I totally agree with the first step being a diet change. However, what I've found is that a cleanse is a good way to get that change rolling. It has a way of resetting the way you think. Diet change is mostly psychological. [In my experience people that are able to complete an entire cleanse change the way they eat so that it's much healthier]. It’s a pipe dream to think that people have always had healthy diets. I totally agree, we have access to healthy foods but too many people take the “convenient” route. If you’ve always had a healthy diet more power to you but that’s rare.
It really bothers me that doctors discourage something that I see (and have experienced) as being highly beneficial based on science not supporting it. Nobody has ever done studies [as far as I know] so we can’t say that science does or doesn’t support it. It’s also hypocritical considering that studies have actually been done on the lack of efficacy of vaccines and the flu shot yet doctors still PUSH them on people.
The concept of everything supported by science is nice but it’s just not possible. Sometimes we have to use common sense. And sometimes we have to think for ourselves and not follow everything that doctors say. They’re human just like me and I’m confident in my own logic and common sense…obviously I’m MORE confident in my own opinion. The most important thing is to do our own research and make our judgments based on what makes sense and not just taking the word of doctors. They’re only doctors…not gods, IMHO.
Friend: Overall, the cleanse idea is a band-aid to the real problem and it distracts people from focusing on the real issue at hand – changing the diet. Exercise (gravity works wonders) and a fiber-rich diet will manage healthy system and aligns with sound health and nutrition recommendations. I also think there’s a way to embrace both eastern and western medicine logic without criticizing one or the other. Now without getting off on a tangent, there are valid reasons for the flu shot but that’s another issue. [She later sent me this article: http://www.cppah.com/article/S1538-5442(10)00004-0/abstract]
Yes, there are major problems with poor dietary choices in America, which is why over 2/3 of our population is considered overweight. We also know that most Americans don’t meet the recommended servings of fruits and vegetables – possibly a HUGE factor in the sluggish gut issue. But cleansing, really, isn’t helping. [I never really got a solid answer as to why she felt cleansing isn’t helping. Is there actual data that shows this?] For those less educated and/or not willing to do the research, seeing something like this purported by someone so highly educated may sway some to do it because it sounds great. Likely, many of those same people have diabetes or other underlying ailments and don’t know it. So I see your good intentions, however, do you see how this could cause more harm than heal? As of now, it’s not recommended by health professionals simply, I’m guessing, because it sounds like quackery. Rule #1 in quackery is, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. [I neglected to ask this but I think it’s valid: isn’t a quick-fix medication also too good to be true? The fact that there are ads for medicines every minor ailment tell me that to have a little pill that claims to fix any issue, big or small, is too good to be true – therefore the quackery argument could be used on medical doctors as well]. You also have to remember, the outcome you have isn’t going to be replicated by everyone, so you’re the exception, not necessarily the rule. [Again, I never really got anything supporting this assumption. I’ve seen many testimonials by people that have completed numerous cleanses and have gotten huge benefits.]
Me:
I think your way of dealing with problems (diet and exercise) is ideal. But we don’t live in a perfect world. Just because someone decided that quackery only applies to homeopathic medicine doesn’t mean it can’t also apply to allopathic medicine. I’ll tell you what my definition of quackery is: prescribing chemicals to “treat” problems that only the body itself can heal. Worse quackery is to prescribe chemicals to deal with the side effects that the first prescribed chemicals created. I believe Western medicine is beneficial in emergency situations but other than that they’ve lost all credibility with me.
I never said that cleansing is for everyone nor did I ever say someone should do it without understanding it completely. If you’ve ever had a conversation with me about this or if you read my blog you’d know that I in fact say the opposite. I’ve stated that it isn’t for everyone and if a person is truly interested in it they must read the books. I can’t emphasize enough the last point. I can’t exactly go into that level of detail in one blog. I wouldn’t even attempt to do so. If you read the blog you will see that I’m vague about the recipe and process. I’m vague for a reason…I want people to inform themselves before even considering it. With people that ask me about it (in person) I am vague there as well and I emphasize that they need to know what it’s about and that it’s NOT about weight loss. It’s about health.
Also, I’m not quite sure how cleansing sounds “too good to be true”. It’s not a simple feat. Cleansing is tough. Only the most disciplined people will even get through the first three days. If they are not informed or misinformed they won’t make it to the second day. It has a way of weeding out the people looking for quick-fixes.
I’m not going to try to convince you that cleansing is actually good for a person’s body. You have your reasons for not agreeing with it based on your own experiences and knowledge. What I will say is that I would never argue with you about something I haven’t done my research on. If I hadn’t researched this extensively I would have given up on your second post. I’m adamant about the benefits (for most people). If people want to take my word for it, it’s up to them.
I don’t think I’m doing any more (in fact I’m pretty sure I’m doing much LESS) harm than the typical doctor that prescribes 5 prescriptions for a little back pain (yes, this is a real-life story…it happened to me). [This was just one example, hence the concept of my blog; in almost every conversation I have regarding illness and doctors I hear the same thing – the first reaction to any illness is a prescription by and large]
So, thanks for the info. One of these days I’ll blog about the importance of exercise and diet to deal with health problems…oh wait, I’ve already done that. But nobody will ever convince me to go back to my allopathic doctor for anything but an emergency.
Friend:
Again, there are ways to embrace both sides of medicine to care for the individual as a whole. I agree with you in that society has become reliant meds/pills for a quick fix [this tells me that she agrees that the medical community provides “quick fixes” and that they’re not a good thing], and I assume some doctors are getting conditioned to this so they give out the pills because that’s what the majority seek. [I don’t totally agree with this; I think it is partly true – hence my response. I’ve heard and seen first hand how doctors prescribe medications to people that aren’t interested in any nor are they asking for medications. Here are a few examples:
When I went in for minor back pain I never asked for a single medication, I only wanted to know what I could do to help ease it. Immediately the doctor prescribed at least four different medications.
My mother’s nephrologist automatically wanted to prescribe medication for her kidney issues; however, my mother refused.
My sister-in-law’s regular doctor retired and when she started going to the doctor that took over his practice he wanted to prescribe a different medication for her blood disorder. She was not interested in a new prescription since the one she’d been on had worked fine for many years. In fact her dosage had progressively decreased. Against his persistence she did not allow the change. His reasoning for wanting to make the change was “This is the pharmaceutical company I go through”.
There are many more examples but here are just a few. I’m fairly certain that most people don’t go to the doctor specifically asking for pharmaceuticals, although I do know that some people do.]
This phenomena is similar to the restaurant industry (weird analogy, I know), but society demanded bigger portions of food when they ate out and over time, we got the super sized version of everything. Well, that contributed to the obesity problem, but it was the restaurants who got reprimanded. We demanded, they supplied, we got fat. In this case, we demand, they supply, we don’t necessarily get well. [Again, I tend to disagree that we “asked” for larger servings, etc.” I’ve never seen data stating so. It’s been said many times that serving sizes 30 years ago were much smaller than they are now. I’m fairly certain that McDonald’s didn’t introduce "supersizing" because people were ordering more than one burger or fries at a time.] So I wouldn’t place too much blame on the doctors…they’re doing what we’ve been asking for. [I would place most of the blame on pharmaceutical companies because of the techniques they use to “buy” doctors. Many times doctors don’t even realize what is happening. Big Pharma controls so much funding to medical schools and therefore most doctors are educated, essentially, by the pharmaceutical industry. A good book to read that echoes this – which I read some time ago – is “Selling Sickness: How the World's Biggest Pharmaceutical Companies Are Turning Us All Into Patients”] Yet, this is why there is currently a huge movement toward preventive medicine – exercise, eat well and modify your behaviors for long lasting health and disease prevention. I do think all sides of medicine essentially support this.
I love your definition of quackery, but leaves me with the impression that you’re clearly one-sided. Quackery is basically non-science. The word “quack”, as it relates to medicine describes a person who has a lot to say about nothing or a pretender to medical skill. [Clearly my bias is showing but I wasn’t always biased; at one time I trusted allopathic medicine completely. It wasn’t until I experienced the non-improvement using it and the improvement using naturopathic treatments and also researching many different resources and using common sense. Still I know there are quacks in natural medicine but this is not to say there aren’t quacks in allopathic medicine. What my friend failed to recognize is that my comment that prescribing drugs is also quackery fits her definition of quackery. Many pharmaceuticals do not undergo clinical studies. In fact, I’ve read that many data have been altered or fudged to get on the shelves. I’ve also read that many studies claiming to be used as support were not double-blind studies and in fact were skewed to get the results that the pharmaceutical companies are after so they can be sold to make a profit. Additionally, many of the studies conducted by the “FDA” are actually funded by Big Pharma so to say that prescribing medications doesn’t fit the definition of quackery is patently untrue. One just has to do a little research to find out the truth. There have been very few drugs that are legitimately approved based on scientific studies.]
I also agree that you make it clear as to your reservations on the cleanse, but I also (big time!) the health connotation you attach to it. If it were healthy, it would be incorporated into public health message. I’m glad to hear you’ve had good experiences with it, I only hope that others are as thorough in their research. [people don’t research the pharmaceuticals they’re prescribed by doctors so what is the difference between them blindly accepting the cleanse versus blindly accepting prescription drugs? I would say the difference is that it would be more logical to research medications since they are actually unnatural chemicals and are known to cause hundreds of side effects. Cleansing is an ancient tradition and was even advocated in the Bible – fasting is shown to be necessary so that “the spirit can overcome the flesh.” This was true in biblical times and is still true today, many people that have completed any kind of fast will tell you that their senses were heightened and their minds became clear. Incidentally, the fasting that was done in biblical times were more extreme than the Master Cleanse. Typically their fasting consisted only of water. Additionally, having the discipline and resolve to complete such a cleanse or fast is proof that the spirit has overcome the flesh. Also, I’m fairly certain that there are no references in the bible to pharmaceuticals or surgeries to treat illness.]
Now going back to the vaccination issue…it’s another form of disease prevention…it saves lives, health care money, and reduces work absences. [My question on this is where she got this information…the statistics? I’ve researched this extensively and haven’t found a single study that shows any of this. I’ve seen the opposite:
http://www.naturalnews.com/027985_H1N1_vaccines_safety.html
http://www.newswithviews.com/Tocco/mary1.htm
http://www.vaccinedangers.com
http://www.rxalternativemedicine.com/blog/post/Vitamin-D-and-the-Flu-Shot-Swine-Flu-Revisited.aspx
just to share a few. There are many more articles and references on the dangers and lack of efficacy of vaccines. I have not yet had a chance to go through her article as closely as I’d like but I will eventually. I will say that I’ve read in many places that the statistics that are constantly being quoted regarding the efficacy of vaccines are subject to serious scrutiny. Many times the data behind these "statistics" were not obtained in a scientific way. This year’s flu season was a case in point. It was one of the worst flu seasons in recent years yet MORE people received the flu shot than ever before: http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1030971/Brace-for-worst-flu-season, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33449637/ I’ve seen this type of statistic many times. I could go on and on, but this blog is about the cleanse, not vaccines.]
The minority who have side-effects are just that, the minority [I believe she is making the same argument here for vaccines that I make for the cleanse; there’s no difference, a small minority can’t or shouldn’t do the cleanse].
Me:
So, I will say (IMO) there is a need for Western medicine in third-world countries. I think, in the US, pharmaceuticals are so overused that they’re causing more harm than good. In small (very small) quantities I think they’re probably ok but that’s even a stretch. Here in America we have access to quality nutrition so there’s really no excuse to be looking for quick-fixes in meds [I initially agreed here but realized that the majority of Americans don’t have access to quality nutrition, still there is a way to keep healthy by prevention and there are cost-effective ways to eat healthy and keep your immune system strong so that it can fight off infection; which is the point]. I agree with what you’re saying about the public demanding larger portions and that doctors are not fully to blame. [I rethought this comment later as well and what I wrote above in brackets is more in line with what I believe. In some ways the public has demanded it but I would say only in the sense that they are actually purchasing the larger size meals and not “boycotting” them. In my opinion if it’s available on the cheap, the public will generally buy it. I could go into the psychology here but again, this isn’t the purpose of this blog]. I will say, however, that there are very few doctors that don’t automatically reach for their prescription pad or that counsel common sense practices such a diet, exercise and drinking enough water (read my second blog for an example). I don’t put all the blame on the public either. The public, in general, is not being informed on what they are really eating when they have fast food or just restaurant food in general. We place our “trust” in the government to look out for us and the media to keep us informed (read your comment about a public health message) but the bottom line is that they’re more concerned with big interests and not our health. I just recently watched Food Inc. I had no idea that ammonia was used in ground beef filler to kill potential bacteria. The FDA allows this not to mention the conditions at feed lots. But we’re trusting them to keep us informed about what’s healthy or not?
It’s funny that you would question the health connotation I attach to the cleanse. I attach that connotation because I truly believe it’s healthy. I’m not going to promote or even condone something I feel is unhealthy.
My quackery comment was the other side of the coin. This is not to say that I don’t believe there’s quackery in other (even natural) medicine. I was just trying to prove a point that quackery doesn’t only apply to homeopathic medicine. Still, I bet I could argue that most of the treatments touted as “quackery” wrt natural health really isn’t quackery.
As far as a “public health message” regarding the safety and efficacy of cleansing…or ANYTHING natural…you can forget about ever seeing anything like that. I believe there is something very sinister behind those public or lack thereof but that’s a topic for another day. Ultimately it goes like this: illness=perceived need for pharmaceuticals=profits to pharmaceutical companies=funding to law makers and the government=less stringent controls on pharma dangers=more strict controls on natural health=illness…and the cycle continues. At the end of the day the people that make the money make the rules and it is those people that benefit from illness in terms of profit. They also control the media and the government. As long as we’re kept in an unhealthy state, we’ll never widely hear about things that could help us become healthy. This is a fact. Why would Big Pharma bite the hands that feed them if they have the power to control the flow of information? [This same argument can be and has been made regarding the vaccination controversy http://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/flu-shot-cost-taxpayers-600-each/. The point is that the pharmaceutical companies have $Billions to gain by “informing” the public of how “good” vaccines and medications supposedly are].
I have a question. So far you’ve made it clear that you disagree with cleansing as a viable healthy option; however, you haven’t told me why. You’ve said that there’s no science to support its benefits and that is harmful but you haven’t told me how you came to that conclusion. Where is the scientific support that states it is not beneficial or that it is harmful? [The article she initially shared states "there is 'little' scientific evidence" and appears to state mostly opinion of someone involved in the ADA. Anytime I see a statement made by someone involved in any "American X Association" (pick the industry) I am leery about their intentions. These types of associations tend to be funded by big interests and are therefore going to debunk anything that might detract from said big interest getting their payoff. What I mean here is that Big Pharma profits from illness and if there's a natural treatment that might prevent people from using pharmaceuticals, Big Pharma can and will do everything in their power to suppress the information." A simple search will show that the ADA gets funding from a variety of pharmaceutical companies as well as large GMO companies (i.e Monsanto and ConAgra) see http://cspinet.cc/integrity/nonprofits/american_dietetic_association.html. This means that their interests lie with their benefactors and NOT the general public. Normally I would have seen that and closed the article immediately but for argument's sake and because someone I have a great deal of respect for sent it to me I am willing to respond to it. Reading further into the story, the author and also the Johns Hopkins doctor point out some of the benefits I've already mentioned: 'detoxing or fasting can be used as a motivational tool for clients who are looking to take on healthier eating. “I think an ideal weight loss method is one where you are choosing a new way of eating that you’re going to be able to maintain rather than doing something for a short period of time and then returning back to your old habits."' The article also states the following: 'Detoxing may not be well researched, but Lanou (the doctor) says some scientists have taken an interest in the merits of fasting. “There is some interesting work that’s been done on fasting—both fasting with only a water fast and fasting with only specific liquids—that have shown real benefits to people with chronic conditions and also some real benefits for people trying to break an addiction, like a smoking habit or an alcohol consumption habit,” she says.' So with that said, the original article seems to be more in line with my reasoning anyway. All-in-all, the article actually supports my position over that against cleansing.]
I’m going to leave you with this; it came from a weekly e-mail sent by author of the (second) book on the Master Cleanse:
I was having dinner with my MD friend, Carlos Garcia, last night (an awesome alternative healer as described in last week's newsletter) and he was telling me he thought the Master Cleanse was a great cleanse. It got me thinking about other MD's who think it is a great cleanse, too.
Dr. Elson Haas, an authority on detoxification, nutrition and health, who has practiced medicine for 25 years and is the author of:
• Staying Healthy with the Seasons
• Staying Healthy with Nutrition
• The Detox Diet
• The Staying Healthy Shopper's Guide
• Vitamins for Dummies
• A Cookbook for All Seasons
• The False Fat Diet
says in his book, The New Detox Diet, that the Master Cleanse is his favorite fast. (p. 61)
"I believe in and consider the cleansing/fasting/detoxification process... to be the missing link in Western nutrition and a key to the health and vitality of our civilization. In over 25 years of medical practice, I have utilized extensively, various detox and healing/rejuvenation practices.... I truly believe that cleansing and detoxification... is virtually one of the most powerful healing therapies (real healing of ailments and not just suppression of symptoms) I have witnessed.... Its effects offer re-balance for the body/mind and are preventive for many health problems." (from "The Purification Process: Healing for Modern Times" by Elson Haas, MD)
He's also said, "Overall, after 35 years of medical practice, I have to say that the fasting/cleansing/detoxification process is the greatest and most effective healing tool I have found. It is an important component for the prevention of degenerative diseases and a key to transformational and evolutionary medicine and healing." (from "Spring Cleansing" by Elson Haas, MD)
Dr. James F. Coy, M.D., Past President of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine said, "In my environmental medicine practice, I attempt to identify toxic elements, physical and spiritual. Then I can help the patient avoid, protect against or detoxify them. I follow that with nutrition to promote as much additional healing as possible. In detoxification, my goal is always to use what works without further harming the patient and I use many, many things.
"The Master Cleanse is simple and combines & surpasses many other detox methods. It literally has been a God-send to my practice. I am grateful to Peter for seeing, loving, and promoting the values of this cleanse."
There were no more responses but I believe you get the gist of the discussion. I hope this shows that there ARE two sides of every argument. I also hope that it shows you that I would not recommend something without having thoroughly researched it.
I know I included many links in this blog and I urge you to try and get through most of them so that you can be informed as well. This is just the tip of the iceberg. There is so much information out there and so many reasons not to blindly trust what you are told.
I also know this is a lengthy blog but I felt it was important to share. This is also the reason I hadn’t posted a blog in over two weeks. I wanted to make sure to take the time and give this the attention it deserves. As usual, feel free to contact me with questions or comments.
Until next time, have a great and healthy week! (or two, depending on how quickly my next blog comes out :)
It’s no secret that many people in the medical field are not in agreement with cleansing for health. I felt that posting the comments (and my responses) to my friend’s discussion would be beneficial to my readers because she is someone I hold in high regard not only because of her intelligence but also her knowledge on the subject – she is a Research Dietitian. I also want to emphasize the importance of diet and exercise with regards to health. She also emphasizes this and therefore I think it drives home the point that all health advocates (traditional/conventional and natural/homeopathic) stress the importance of diet and exercise.
I do not want to detract from the discussion on the cleanse but I do think it is necessary to leave in our comments on vaccinations to understand the context in which they were used. With that said, below is the discussion verbatim with my additional comments in brackets and italics.I added this information after the fact to provide more information on my position. Feel free to comment and add your own experiences and expertise as you see fit.
After posting my blog, the first comment from my friend began with this:
Friend: Probably worth checking this out http://www.todaysdietitian.com/newarchives/tdmay2008pg34.shtml.
My response: I've read pages and pages of people "trying to help" by saying cleansing is bad for you. I don't buy it. My logic tells me our bodies aren't digesting properly due to our diets. I've done an extreme cleanse 5 times and have only gotten positive outcomes. I do agree that the particular cleanse I do is not for everyone but that's why I recommend that anyone interested read the books on the subject. [And although I say it’s not for everyone, I believe there are only a small few that don’t benefit]
Friend: My only problem is that the science doesn't support it....and being in research, I tend to support that school of thought. The first step to improving your health is to change your diet. Your body is designed to digest a mixture of foods while your liver does the detox. Best way to keep both your digestive tract and liver healthy is to consume your vegetables and fruit…and your whole grains and fluid. There is nothing wrong with the food supply, only the choices we make in nourishing our bodies. [I would have to differ here because I believe our food supply gets worse every year. I believe that people with a decent income have access to high quality food in our country but most people don’t have a decent income and/or their money is already spoken-for. With the increase of feedlots and the use of pesticides, our food supply is becoming more and more harmful] But you’re right, it is an individual choice.
Me: I totally agree with the first step being a diet change. However, what I've found is that a cleanse is a good way to get that change rolling. It has a way of resetting the way you think. Diet change is mostly psychological. [In my experience people that are able to complete an entire cleanse change the way they eat so that it's much healthier]. It’s a pipe dream to think that people have always had healthy diets. I totally agree, we have access to healthy foods but too many people take the “convenient” route. If you’ve always had a healthy diet more power to you but that’s rare.
It really bothers me that doctors discourage something that I see (and have experienced) as being highly beneficial based on science not supporting it. Nobody has ever done studies [as far as I know] so we can’t say that science does or doesn’t support it. It’s also hypocritical considering that studies have actually been done on the lack of efficacy of vaccines and the flu shot yet doctors still PUSH them on people.
The concept of everything supported by science is nice but it’s just not possible. Sometimes we have to use common sense. And sometimes we have to think for ourselves and not follow everything that doctors say. They’re human just like me and I’m confident in my own logic and common sense…obviously I’m MORE confident in my own opinion. The most important thing is to do our own research and make our judgments based on what makes sense and not just taking the word of doctors. They’re only doctors…not gods, IMHO.
Friend: Overall, the cleanse idea is a band-aid to the real problem and it distracts people from focusing on the real issue at hand – changing the diet. Exercise (gravity works wonders) and a fiber-rich diet will manage healthy system and aligns with sound health and nutrition recommendations. I also think there’s a way to embrace both eastern and western medicine logic without criticizing one or the other. Now without getting off on a tangent, there are valid reasons for the flu shot but that’s another issue. [She later sent me this article: http://www.cppah.com/article/S1538-5442(10)00004-0/abstract]
Yes, there are major problems with poor dietary choices in America, which is why over 2/3 of our population is considered overweight. We also know that most Americans don’t meet the recommended servings of fruits and vegetables – possibly a HUGE factor in the sluggish gut issue. But cleansing, really, isn’t helping. [I never really got a solid answer as to why she felt cleansing isn’t helping. Is there actual data that shows this?] For those less educated and/or not willing to do the research, seeing something like this purported by someone so highly educated may sway some to do it because it sounds great. Likely, many of those same people have diabetes or other underlying ailments and don’t know it. So I see your good intentions, however, do you see how this could cause more harm than heal? As of now, it’s not recommended by health professionals simply, I’m guessing, because it sounds like quackery. Rule #1 in quackery is, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. [I neglected to ask this but I think it’s valid: isn’t a quick-fix medication also too good to be true? The fact that there are ads for medicines every minor ailment tell me that to have a little pill that claims to fix any issue, big or small, is too good to be true – therefore the quackery argument could be used on medical doctors as well]. You also have to remember, the outcome you have isn’t going to be replicated by everyone, so you’re the exception, not necessarily the rule. [Again, I never really got anything supporting this assumption. I’ve seen many testimonials by people that have completed numerous cleanses and have gotten huge benefits.]
Me:
I think your way of dealing with problems (diet and exercise) is ideal. But we don’t live in a perfect world. Just because someone decided that quackery only applies to homeopathic medicine doesn’t mean it can’t also apply to allopathic medicine. I’ll tell you what my definition of quackery is: prescribing chemicals to “treat” problems that only the body itself can heal. Worse quackery is to prescribe chemicals to deal with the side effects that the first prescribed chemicals created. I believe Western medicine is beneficial in emergency situations but other than that they’ve lost all credibility with me.
I never said that cleansing is for everyone nor did I ever say someone should do it without understanding it completely. If you’ve ever had a conversation with me about this or if you read my blog you’d know that I in fact say the opposite. I’ve stated that it isn’t for everyone and if a person is truly interested in it they must read the books. I can’t emphasize enough the last point. I can’t exactly go into that level of detail in one blog. I wouldn’t even attempt to do so. If you read the blog you will see that I’m vague about the recipe and process. I’m vague for a reason…I want people to inform themselves before even considering it. With people that ask me about it (in person) I am vague there as well and I emphasize that they need to know what it’s about and that it’s NOT about weight loss. It’s about health.
Also, I’m not quite sure how cleansing sounds “too good to be true”. It’s not a simple feat. Cleansing is tough. Only the most disciplined people will even get through the first three days. If they are not informed or misinformed they won’t make it to the second day. It has a way of weeding out the people looking for quick-fixes.
I’m not going to try to convince you that cleansing is actually good for a person’s body. You have your reasons for not agreeing with it based on your own experiences and knowledge. What I will say is that I would never argue with you about something I haven’t done my research on. If I hadn’t researched this extensively I would have given up on your second post. I’m adamant about the benefits (for most people). If people want to take my word for it, it’s up to them.
I don’t think I’m doing any more (in fact I’m pretty sure I’m doing much LESS) harm than the typical doctor that prescribes 5 prescriptions for a little back pain (yes, this is a real-life story…it happened to me). [This was just one example, hence the concept of my blog; in almost every conversation I have regarding illness and doctors I hear the same thing – the first reaction to any illness is a prescription by and large]
So, thanks for the info. One of these days I’ll blog about the importance of exercise and diet to deal with health problems…oh wait, I’ve already done that. But nobody will ever convince me to go back to my allopathic doctor for anything but an emergency.
Friend:
Again, there are ways to embrace both sides of medicine to care for the individual as a whole. I agree with you in that society has become reliant meds/pills for a quick fix [this tells me that she agrees that the medical community provides “quick fixes” and that they’re not a good thing], and I assume some doctors are getting conditioned to this so they give out the pills because that’s what the majority seek. [I don’t totally agree with this; I think it is partly true – hence my response. I’ve heard and seen first hand how doctors prescribe medications to people that aren’t interested in any nor are they asking for medications. Here are a few examples:
When I went in for minor back pain I never asked for a single medication, I only wanted to know what I could do to help ease it. Immediately the doctor prescribed at least four different medications.
My mother’s nephrologist automatically wanted to prescribe medication for her kidney issues; however, my mother refused.
My sister-in-law’s regular doctor retired and when she started going to the doctor that took over his practice he wanted to prescribe a different medication for her blood disorder. She was not interested in a new prescription since the one she’d been on had worked fine for many years. In fact her dosage had progressively decreased. Against his persistence she did not allow the change. His reasoning for wanting to make the change was “This is the pharmaceutical company I go through”.
There are many more examples but here are just a few. I’m fairly certain that most people don’t go to the doctor specifically asking for pharmaceuticals, although I do know that some people do.]
This phenomena is similar to the restaurant industry (weird analogy, I know), but society demanded bigger portions of food when they ate out and over time, we got the super sized version of everything. Well, that contributed to the obesity problem, but it was the restaurants who got reprimanded. We demanded, they supplied, we got fat. In this case, we demand, they supply, we don’t necessarily get well. [Again, I tend to disagree that we “asked” for larger servings, etc.” I’ve never seen data stating so. It’s been said many times that serving sizes 30 years ago were much smaller than they are now. I’m fairly certain that McDonald’s didn’t introduce "supersizing" because people were ordering more than one burger or fries at a time.] So I wouldn’t place too much blame on the doctors…they’re doing what we’ve been asking for. [I would place most of the blame on pharmaceutical companies because of the techniques they use to “buy” doctors. Many times doctors don’t even realize what is happening. Big Pharma controls so much funding to medical schools and therefore most doctors are educated, essentially, by the pharmaceutical industry. A good book to read that echoes this – which I read some time ago – is “Selling Sickness: How the World's Biggest Pharmaceutical Companies Are Turning Us All Into Patients”] Yet, this is why there is currently a huge movement toward preventive medicine – exercise, eat well and modify your behaviors for long lasting health and disease prevention. I do think all sides of medicine essentially support this.
I love your definition of quackery, but leaves me with the impression that you’re clearly one-sided. Quackery is basically non-science. The word “quack”, as it relates to medicine describes a person who has a lot to say about nothing or a pretender to medical skill. [Clearly my bias is showing but I wasn’t always biased; at one time I trusted allopathic medicine completely. It wasn’t until I experienced the non-improvement using it and the improvement using naturopathic treatments and also researching many different resources and using common sense. Still I know there are quacks in natural medicine but this is not to say there aren’t quacks in allopathic medicine. What my friend failed to recognize is that my comment that prescribing drugs is also quackery fits her definition of quackery. Many pharmaceuticals do not undergo clinical studies. In fact, I’ve read that many data have been altered or fudged to get on the shelves. I’ve also read that many studies claiming to be used as support were not double-blind studies and in fact were skewed to get the results that the pharmaceutical companies are after so they can be sold to make a profit. Additionally, many of the studies conducted by the “FDA” are actually funded by Big Pharma so to say that prescribing medications doesn’t fit the definition of quackery is patently untrue. One just has to do a little research to find out the truth. There have been very few drugs that are legitimately approved based on scientific studies.]
I also agree that you make it clear as to your reservations on the cleanse, but I also (big time!) the health connotation you attach to it. If it were healthy, it would be incorporated into public health message. I’m glad to hear you’ve had good experiences with it, I only hope that others are as thorough in their research. [people don’t research the pharmaceuticals they’re prescribed by doctors so what is the difference between them blindly accepting the cleanse versus blindly accepting prescription drugs? I would say the difference is that it would be more logical to research medications since they are actually unnatural chemicals and are known to cause hundreds of side effects. Cleansing is an ancient tradition and was even advocated in the Bible – fasting is shown to be necessary so that “the spirit can overcome the flesh.” This was true in biblical times and is still true today, many people that have completed any kind of fast will tell you that their senses were heightened and their minds became clear. Incidentally, the fasting that was done in biblical times were more extreme than the Master Cleanse. Typically their fasting consisted only of water. Additionally, having the discipline and resolve to complete such a cleanse or fast is proof that the spirit has overcome the flesh. Also, I’m fairly certain that there are no references in the bible to pharmaceuticals or surgeries to treat illness.]
Now going back to the vaccination issue…it’s another form of disease prevention…it saves lives, health care money, and reduces work absences. [My question on this is where she got this information…the statistics? I’ve researched this extensively and haven’t found a single study that shows any of this. I’ve seen the opposite:
http://www.naturalnews.com/027985_H1N1_vaccines_safety.html
http://www.newswithviews.com/Tocco/mary1.htm
http://www.vaccinedangers.com
http://www.rxalternativemedicine.com/blog/post/Vitamin-D-and-the-Flu-Shot-Swine-Flu-Revisited.aspx
just to share a few. There are many more articles and references on the dangers and lack of efficacy of vaccines. I have not yet had a chance to go through her article as closely as I’d like but I will eventually. I will say that I’ve read in many places that the statistics that are constantly being quoted regarding the efficacy of vaccines are subject to serious scrutiny. Many times the data behind these "statistics" were not obtained in a scientific way. This year’s flu season was a case in point. It was one of the worst flu seasons in recent years yet MORE people received the flu shot than ever before: http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1030971/Brace-for-worst-flu-season, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33449637/ I’ve seen this type of statistic many times. I could go on and on, but this blog is about the cleanse, not vaccines.]
The minority who have side-effects are just that, the minority [I believe she is making the same argument here for vaccines that I make for the cleanse; there’s no difference, a small minority can’t or shouldn’t do the cleanse].
Me:
So, I will say (IMO) there is a need for Western medicine in third-world countries. I think, in the US, pharmaceuticals are so overused that they’re causing more harm than good. In small (very small) quantities I think they’re probably ok but that’s even a stretch. Here in America we have access to quality nutrition so there’s really no excuse to be looking for quick-fixes in meds [I initially agreed here but realized that the majority of Americans don’t have access to quality nutrition, still there is a way to keep healthy by prevention and there are cost-effective ways to eat healthy and keep your immune system strong so that it can fight off infection; which is the point]. I agree with what you’re saying about the public demanding larger portions and that doctors are not fully to blame. [I rethought this comment later as well and what I wrote above in brackets is more in line with what I believe. In some ways the public has demanded it but I would say only in the sense that they are actually purchasing the larger size meals and not “boycotting” them. In my opinion if it’s available on the cheap, the public will generally buy it. I could go into the psychology here but again, this isn’t the purpose of this blog]. I will say, however, that there are very few doctors that don’t automatically reach for their prescription pad or that counsel common sense practices such a diet, exercise and drinking enough water (read my second blog for an example). I don’t put all the blame on the public either. The public, in general, is not being informed on what they are really eating when they have fast food or just restaurant food in general. We place our “trust” in the government to look out for us and the media to keep us informed (read your comment about a public health message) but the bottom line is that they’re more concerned with big interests and not our health. I just recently watched Food Inc. I had no idea that ammonia was used in ground beef filler to kill potential bacteria. The FDA allows this not to mention the conditions at feed lots. But we’re trusting them to keep us informed about what’s healthy or not?
It’s funny that you would question the health connotation I attach to the cleanse. I attach that connotation because I truly believe it’s healthy. I’m not going to promote or even condone something I feel is unhealthy.
My quackery comment was the other side of the coin. This is not to say that I don’t believe there’s quackery in other (even natural) medicine. I was just trying to prove a point that quackery doesn’t only apply to homeopathic medicine. Still, I bet I could argue that most of the treatments touted as “quackery” wrt natural health really isn’t quackery.
As far as a “public health message” regarding the safety and efficacy of cleansing…or ANYTHING natural…you can forget about ever seeing anything like that. I believe there is something very sinister behind those public or lack thereof but that’s a topic for another day. Ultimately it goes like this: illness=perceived need for pharmaceuticals=profits to pharmaceutical companies=funding to law makers and the government=less stringent controls on pharma dangers=more strict controls on natural health=illness…and the cycle continues. At the end of the day the people that make the money make the rules and it is those people that benefit from illness in terms of profit. They also control the media and the government. As long as we’re kept in an unhealthy state, we’ll never widely hear about things that could help us become healthy. This is a fact. Why would Big Pharma bite the hands that feed them if they have the power to control the flow of information? [This same argument can be and has been made regarding the vaccination controversy http://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/flu-shot-cost-taxpayers-600-each/. The point is that the pharmaceutical companies have $Billions to gain by “informing” the public of how “good” vaccines and medications supposedly are].
I have a question. So far you’ve made it clear that you disagree with cleansing as a viable healthy option; however, you haven’t told me why. You’ve said that there’s no science to support its benefits and that is harmful but you haven’t told me how you came to that conclusion. Where is the scientific support that states it is not beneficial or that it is harmful? [The article she initially shared states "there is 'little' scientific evidence" and appears to state mostly opinion of someone involved in the ADA. Anytime I see a statement made by someone involved in any "American X Association" (pick the industry) I am leery about their intentions. These types of associations tend to be funded by big interests and are therefore going to debunk anything that might detract from said big interest getting their payoff. What I mean here is that Big Pharma profits from illness and if there's a natural treatment that might prevent people from using pharmaceuticals, Big Pharma can and will do everything in their power to suppress the information." A simple search will show that the ADA gets funding from a variety of pharmaceutical companies as well as large GMO companies (i.e Monsanto and ConAgra) see http://cspinet.cc/integrity/nonprofits/american_dietetic_association.html. This means that their interests lie with their benefactors and NOT the general public. Normally I would have seen that and closed the article immediately but for argument's sake and because someone I have a great deal of respect for sent it to me I am willing to respond to it. Reading further into the story, the author and also the Johns Hopkins doctor point out some of the benefits I've already mentioned: 'detoxing or fasting can be used as a motivational tool for clients who are looking to take on healthier eating. “I think an ideal weight loss method is one where you are choosing a new way of eating that you’re going to be able to maintain rather than doing something for a short period of time and then returning back to your old habits."' The article also states the following: 'Detoxing may not be well researched, but Lanou (the doctor) says some scientists have taken an interest in the merits of fasting. “There is some interesting work that’s been done on fasting—both fasting with only a water fast and fasting with only specific liquids—that have shown real benefits to people with chronic conditions and also some real benefits for people trying to break an addiction, like a smoking habit or an alcohol consumption habit,” she says.' So with that said, the original article seems to be more in line with my reasoning anyway. All-in-all, the article actually supports my position over that against cleansing.]
I’m going to leave you with this; it came from a weekly e-mail sent by author of the (second) book on the Master Cleanse:
I was having dinner with my MD friend, Carlos Garcia, last night (an awesome alternative healer as described in last week's newsletter) and he was telling me he thought the Master Cleanse was a great cleanse. It got me thinking about other MD's who think it is a great cleanse, too.
Dr. Elson Haas, an authority on detoxification, nutrition and health, who has practiced medicine for 25 years and is the author of:
• Staying Healthy with the Seasons
• Staying Healthy with Nutrition
• The Detox Diet
• The Staying Healthy Shopper's Guide
• Vitamins for Dummies
• A Cookbook for All Seasons
• The False Fat Diet
says in his book, The New Detox Diet, that the Master Cleanse is his favorite fast. (p. 61)
"I believe in and consider the cleansing/fasting/detoxification process... to be the missing link in Western nutrition and a key to the health and vitality of our civilization. In over 25 years of medical practice, I have utilized extensively, various detox and healing/rejuvenation practices.... I truly believe that cleansing and detoxification... is virtually one of the most powerful healing therapies (real healing of ailments and not just suppression of symptoms) I have witnessed.... Its effects offer re-balance for the body/mind and are preventive for many health problems." (from "The Purification Process: Healing for Modern Times" by Elson Haas, MD)
He's also said, "Overall, after 35 years of medical practice, I have to say that the fasting/cleansing/detoxification process is the greatest and most effective healing tool I have found. It is an important component for the prevention of degenerative diseases and a key to transformational and evolutionary medicine and healing." (from "Spring Cleansing" by Elson Haas, MD)
Dr. James F. Coy, M.D., Past President of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine said, "In my environmental medicine practice, I attempt to identify toxic elements, physical and spiritual. Then I can help the patient avoid, protect against or detoxify them. I follow that with nutrition to promote as much additional healing as possible. In detoxification, my goal is always to use what works without further harming the patient and I use many, many things.
"The Master Cleanse is simple and combines & surpasses many other detox methods. It literally has been a God-send to my practice. I am grateful to Peter for seeing, loving, and promoting the values of this cleanse."
There were no more responses but I believe you get the gist of the discussion. I hope this shows that there ARE two sides of every argument. I also hope that it shows you that I would not recommend something without having thoroughly researched it.
I know I included many links in this blog and I urge you to try and get through most of them so that you can be informed as well. This is just the tip of the iceberg. There is so much information out there and so many reasons not to blindly trust what you are told.
I also know this is a lengthy blog but I felt it was important to share. This is also the reason I hadn’t posted a blog in over two weeks. I wanted to make sure to take the time and give this the attention it deserves. As usual, feel free to contact me with questions or comments.
Until next time, have a great and healthy week! (or two, depending on how quickly my next blog comes out :)
Sunday, March 14, 2010
The Master Cleanse
For this week’s blog I’m going to take a little break from the medications to talk about The Master Cleanse. It’s a good time to do it now since I just finished my 5th Master Cleanse. I just want to talk briefly about why it is important to do an internal cleanse every so often and why I like The Master Cleanse. Some of what I’ll be writing isn’t for the faint of heart. I don’t mean to sound gross but to get my point across I’ll have to go into some details that I normally wouldn’t so bear with me.
Our bodies are designed to digest food within 24 hours of consuming it but because our diets are, shall I say, less than ideal, as most humans (who eat the typical diet) take up to 72 hours to digest food. With our diets full of processed foods and very little fiber (from whole grains or leafy green vegetables) much of what we consume stays in the colon only to cause future intestinal problems such as colon cancer and digestive problems.
Whole grains and fiber help serve as a sort of broom to brush our intestines and help get rid of waste. Because of the typical American diet our digestive systems are not being utilized to their full potential and, actually we really aren’t getting nutrients the way we are supposed to. Much of the food in the typical American diet doesn’t have nutrients at all or, what little nutrients that are there, don’t get absorbed by the body.
Diets high in meat and dairy products are mucus-forming. Mucus is actually a type of protection that our bodies create to help deal with foreign bodies such as toxins, viruses, or bacteria. Think about viruses – anytime we contract viruses almost immediately our bodies begin to create mucus to rid our bodies of those viruses. It is no different when we eat mucus-forming foods such as meat and dairy products. Our bodies create a protective layer within the colon to deal with these products.
I’m not advocating vegetarianism, it’s a personal choice and I’m not willing to become a vegetarian at this point myself. In fact, I believe we, as omnivores, require meat in our diets (a topic for another post). I do, however, advocate moderation. I believe that as long as we limit these types of foods in our diets our bodies can handle the negative aspects. Also, I advocate using only natural food sources, including meat sources. Feedlot cattle are disease-ridden and highly toxic. I recommend the movie Food, Inc. if you don’t believe me. I discovered, from that movie, that manufacturers of ground beef coming out of feed lots use fillers to stretch the product, no surprise there really, but what I didn’t know is that they use ammonia in the fillers to kill any potential bacteria, such as E. Coli.
Feedlot cattle are fed grain to make them bigger and to grow faster; however, the grain changes the pH in the cow’s stomachs creating a more acidic environment. Cows are, by nature, ruminants, meaning they eat grass. Eating grass maintains a more neutral pH in their stomachs. As a result, any bacteria that might be present are able to adjust to survive in a neutral environment. Because the bacteria have this ability they are also able to adjust to an acidic environment. This means that human stomach acid would no longer be able to kill potential bacteria. Feedlots are changing the natural bodily functions of cattle that allow humans to eat the meat. ALL fast food meat and probably most restaurant meat come from feedlots. This means that eating out is detrimental to your health.
Additionally, pesticides used on our fruits and vegetables as well as the irradiation used to “clean” the produce are stripping much of the nutrients from these normally healthy foods. That is, if your diet consists of conventional fruits and vegetables. If you eat primarily organic, clearly you will be getting more nutrients. On the other hand, if your diet consists of mostly processed foods (think all the foods in the center aisles of the supermarket) then you are getting very few nutrients. Not only do processed foods contain few nutrients, they also contain additives that are by and large full of toxins. Just look at the labels and some of the ingredients, and then do a search on what those ingredients are and how they’re detrimental to health.
Toxins we consume in the form of these foods as well as other toxins that our bodies are unable to release are stored in fat cells. For a great explanation on how this happens, and why we have belly fat, I recommend the book The Fat Flush Plan. Toxins also live in our waste, some of which does not leave our bodies in the intended 24 hours. For these reasons, I believe it is absolutely necessary to do a colon and full-body cleansing periodically to assist our bodies in the functions they are designed to perform naturally but are unable because of the diets and lifestyles of so many Americans today.
I have tried using cleansing products in the form of capsules (or kits) in the past. These typically require a regimented diet and special foods. I found that this type of discipline is too difficult for me. Call me crazy but it’s much simpler for me to not eat anything at all and drink the same (homemade) drink for ten days than it is to eat specific foods. This is essentially what the Master Cleanse consists of. It consists of: a laxative tea, a saltwater flush, and a lemonade drink made with fresh squeezed organic lemons, organic grade B maple syrup and cayenne pepper.
The purpose of the lemon is to mobilize toxins within your body and break off old waste from the colon walls; the cayenne pepper is used to break up the mucus lining within the colon, and the maple syrup is used primarily for calories and energy. It is thought that the grade B syrup is drawn when the most nutrients are in the syrup, which is the purpose for this particular syrup. The laxative tea is used at night and the saltwater flush is used in the morning to flush out the waste and toxins that were mobilized the day before.
Some people may experience two or three “detox” days. These are days in which they feel symptoms of problems they’ve had in the past or even just symptoms of withdrawal from certain day-to-day habits such as coffee or sodas. People that have a lot of caffeine in their diets tend to get headaches during the cleanse either toward the beginning or in some cases, throughout the whole cleanse. Also, people with certain issues, such as reflux or joint problems will find those symptoms pronounced on certain days of the cleanse. These are detox symptoms. They rear their ugly heads when the toxins causing those issues are mobilized during the cleanse.
When I do the Master Cleanse I do it for health reasons and to “re-set” the way I see food. I find it highly beneficial and effective. The icing on the cake is the weight loss. It’s typical for women to lose 10 pounds and for men to lose up to 15. You must be careful how you incorporate food back into your diet after you’ve completed the cleanse so that you don’t gain all the weight back (and so that you don't hurt yourself). Your digestive system needs time to start digesting again so solid food is not incorporated until a couple of days after it is over.
I’ve had various experiences while on the cleanse but one recurring theme is the energy and vitality I feel. In some cases I go through one or two days of “detox” symptoms, although they aren’t typically debilitating in my case – I’m still able to function normally (and usually with a ton of energy!). After those two days, I have enough energy to zoom through my day and I am also able to do my normal work out. After I finished my latest (5th) cleanse and began eating normal food, in this case a salad, I immediately felt the drain of energy that it takes to digest food. We do not realize how much energy is expended by our bodies just to digest the food we eat. I felt it immediately.
I know many people think they couldn’t do this cleanse because of the idea of not eating. I say that if I can do it, anyone can. I love food. It’s one of my pleasures. I look forward to food. Doing this cleanse shows me that I can accomplish anything I put mind to. It’s not only physically healthy, it is also empowering. One of the things I find so remarkable when I’m doing these cleanses is the fact that we really don’t need much food to survive. I’ve read that having a calorie-restrictive diet can increase a person’s life by at least 10 years. Doing a cleanse can help kick-start a lifestyle of fewer calories.
Doing a Master Cleanse allows you to absorb more nutrients than you probably had in years. The mucus-forming foods we eat cause a barrier between the lining of the colon and the food that passes through. This means that fewer nutrients are actually absorbed into the bloodstream. After cleansing, and before you recreate that mucus lining, you are able to absorb much more nutrients. The way I see it is that you have a clean slate to work with. It’s a way to be removed from, what I see, as a “food-addiction”. I feel that many Americans today are obese and overindulge because of a food addiction. Doing a Master Cleanse removes you from that and allows you to see that we do not have to be what we eat. It allows for clarity of mind that we wouldn’t typically have.
I have turned many people on to this and have gotten excellent feedback. What I recommend to people is that if they really are interested in doing this cleanse for their health they read both books on the subject. Without reading these books they will almost certainly fail. It is absolutely necessary to understand exactly what you’re getting yourself into and what to expect. But I feel that once you know, and once you’ve tried it you will be able to continue a path of health and pursue future cleanses with very little effort. I try to do one at least once a year. I do have to plan my life around them so I try to plan them for a time of year that I can dedicate at least a month of healthy eating including the two weeks required to do the cleanse and to break it.
Finally, I'd like to wrap up my blog on The Master Cleanse by discussing some of the amazing benefits that I've experienced from doing this cleanse:
Clear skin - this cleanse was actually quite noticeable. I don't have the nicest complexion - never have - but I'm enjoying a clear, bright complexion after this cleanse.
More energy - as I mentioned before, toward the end of the cleanse I had quite a bit of energy but sticking to a healthy diet after the cleanse allows for much of that energy to continue.
Clarity of mind - Even the bible talks about how fasting allows the spirit to rise above the flesh. I always find it amazing how clear my mind is and how much it makes me realize that food can be a hindrance to our thinking. I'm not just referring to the lack of proper nutrition from our foods or even the distraction that comes with always thinking of your next meal, but the simple act of not eating for 10 days clears your mind and helps you focus on other important things.
Emotional detox - With every cleanse I do I seem to be happier. The emotional detox on this, my 5th cleanse, was not nearly as bad as the first. I recall my first cleanse. I was a pill for at least 3 of the the 10 days...and this is a recurring theme among people that do the cleanse; my best friend has done a couple of these and her husband never fails to mention her moods. I know some people might attribute this to "not eating". I know I tend to get cranky when I'm hungry. But this is not the case during the cleanse. As well as detoxing from all the toxins within your body, you're also detoxing from toxins in your brain. Naturally, when you're releasing toxins you're going to feel those symptoms. Interestingly, I heard on the John Tesh Radio Show yesterday that a test was conducted on the tears of people who were crying over emotional reasons versus those that were crying due to exposure to onions. The emotional tears showed toxic stress hormones while those from onions showed none. Clearly crying is our bodies' way of ridding ourselves of harmful stress hormones and toxins. During the cleanse, these are being released in a variety of ways - sometimes tears, sometimes waste, and sometimes through saliva. Our bodies are so amazing. Not only were we given the ability to heal ourselves naturally (think of the way a cut heals by creating a clot, then a scab, and then a renews the skin) but also to remove harmful toxins from our bodies. Our sweat glands, lymphatic glands, tear ducts, and even saliva are ways to remove toxins from our bodies. Since I've been cleansing, I am a much happier person in general. There's a popular "healer" that lives in my area and we run into him every once in a while. He noticed that the last time he saw me I wasn't stressed out at all. The first time he saw me he saw the aura of stress. Clearly these natural things are working!
And last, but definitely not least is the weight loss. This cleanse I lost right around 10 pounds and, thankfully, due to breaking the cleanse gently and staying off meat and alcohol (which I will continue to do for at least another 3 weeks...and then moderately after that) among other "bad" things, I'm keeping it off. I don't have to tout the benefits of weight loss but one thing both my boyfriend and I feel is a huge benefit is being lighter and being able to exercise more easily. My little dog weighs ten pounds so to make a point, after the cleanse, I picked her up and started walking around with her. I told my boyfriend..."This is how much more weight I'd been carrying around." It doesn't "sound" like much, but if you're not at your ideal weight I challenge you to try this, find something that weighs ten pounds and walk around with it even just for five minutes. I think you'll find that it is much more difficult than without it. We don't realize how much even a little extra weight means to our bodies - joints, muscles, ligaments, and even brain will thank you for it.
Here's to health, being clean, losing your excess weight,and being happy!!
Have a great week!
Our bodies are designed to digest food within 24 hours of consuming it but because our diets are, shall I say, less than ideal, as most humans (who eat the typical diet) take up to 72 hours to digest food. With our diets full of processed foods and very little fiber (from whole grains or leafy green vegetables) much of what we consume stays in the colon only to cause future intestinal problems such as colon cancer and digestive problems.
Whole grains and fiber help serve as a sort of broom to brush our intestines and help get rid of waste. Because of the typical American diet our digestive systems are not being utilized to their full potential and, actually we really aren’t getting nutrients the way we are supposed to. Much of the food in the typical American diet doesn’t have nutrients at all or, what little nutrients that are there, don’t get absorbed by the body.
Diets high in meat and dairy products are mucus-forming. Mucus is actually a type of protection that our bodies create to help deal with foreign bodies such as toxins, viruses, or bacteria. Think about viruses – anytime we contract viruses almost immediately our bodies begin to create mucus to rid our bodies of those viruses. It is no different when we eat mucus-forming foods such as meat and dairy products. Our bodies create a protective layer within the colon to deal with these products.
I’m not advocating vegetarianism, it’s a personal choice and I’m not willing to become a vegetarian at this point myself. In fact, I believe we, as omnivores, require meat in our diets (a topic for another post). I do, however, advocate moderation. I believe that as long as we limit these types of foods in our diets our bodies can handle the negative aspects. Also, I advocate using only natural food sources, including meat sources. Feedlot cattle are disease-ridden and highly toxic. I recommend the movie Food, Inc. if you don’t believe me. I discovered, from that movie, that manufacturers of ground beef coming out of feed lots use fillers to stretch the product, no surprise there really, but what I didn’t know is that they use ammonia in the fillers to kill any potential bacteria, such as E. Coli.
Feedlot cattle are fed grain to make them bigger and to grow faster; however, the grain changes the pH in the cow’s stomachs creating a more acidic environment. Cows are, by nature, ruminants, meaning they eat grass. Eating grass maintains a more neutral pH in their stomachs. As a result, any bacteria that might be present are able to adjust to survive in a neutral environment. Because the bacteria have this ability they are also able to adjust to an acidic environment. This means that human stomach acid would no longer be able to kill potential bacteria. Feedlots are changing the natural bodily functions of cattle that allow humans to eat the meat. ALL fast food meat and probably most restaurant meat come from feedlots. This means that eating out is detrimental to your health.
Additionally, pesticides used on our fruits and vegetables as well as the irradiation used to “clean” the produce are stripping much of the nutrients from these normally healthy foods. That is, if your diet consists of conventional fruits and vegetables. If you eat primarily organic, clearly you will be getting more nutrients. On the other hand, if your diet consists of mostly processed foods (think all the foods in the center aisles of the supermarket) then you are getting very few nutrients. Not only do processed foods contain few nutrients, they also contain additives that are by and large full of toxins. Just look at the labels and some of the ingredients, and then do a search on what those ingredients are and how they’re detrimental to health.
Toxins we consume in the form of these foods as well as other toxins that our bodies are unable to release are stored in fat cells. For a great explanation on how this happens, and why we have belly fat, I recommend the book The Fat Flush Plan. Toxins also live in our waste, some of which does not leave our bodies in the intended 24 hours. For these reasons, I believe it is absolutely necessary to do a colon and full-body cleansing periodically to assist our bodies in the functions they are designed to perform naturally but are unable because of the diets and lifestyles of so many Americans today.
I have tried using cleansing products in the form of capsules (or kits) in the past. These typically require a regimented diet and special foods. I found that this type of discipline is too difficult for me. Call me crazy but it’s much simpler for me to not eat anything at all and drink the same (homemade) drink for ten days than it is to eat specific foods. This is essentially what the Master Cleanse consists of. It consists of: a laxative tea, a saltwater flush, and a lemonade drink made with fresh squeezed organic lemons, organic grade B maple syrup and cayenne pepper.
The purpose of the lemon is to mobilize toxins within your body and break off old waste from the colon walls; the cayenne pepper is used to break up the mucus lining within the colon, and the maple syrup is used primarily for calories and energy. It is thought that the grade B syrup is drawn when the most nutrients are in the syrup, which is the purpose for this particular syrup. The laxative tea is used at night and the saltwater flush is used in the morning to flush out the waste and toxins that were mobilized the day before.
Some people may experience two or three “detox” days. These are days in which they feel symptoms of problems they’ve had in the past or even just symptoms of withdrawal from certain day-to-day habits such as coffee or sodas. People that have a lot of caffeine in their diets tend to get headaches during the cleanse either toward the beginning or in some cases, throughout the whole cleanse. Also, people with certain issues, such as reflux or joint problems will find those symptoms pronounced on certain days of the cleanse. These are detox symptoms. They rear their ugly heads when the toxins causing those issues are mobilized during the cleanse.
When I do the Master Cleanse I do it for health reasons and to “re-set” the way I see food. I find it highly beneficial and effective. The icing on the cake is the weight loss. It’s typical for women to lose 10 pounds and for men to lose up to 15. You must be careful how you incorporate food back into your diet after you’ve completed the cleanse so that you don’t gain all the weight back (and so that you don't hurt yourself). Your digestive system needs time to start digesting again so solid food is not incorporated until a couple of days after it is over.
I’ve had various experiences while on the cleanse but one recurring theme is the energy and vitality I feel. In some cases I go through one or two days of “detox” symptoms, although they aren’t typically debilitating in my case – I’m still able to function normally (and usually with a ton of energy!). After those two days, I have enough energy to zoom through my day and I am also able to do my normal work out. After I finished my latest (5th) cleanse and began eating normal food, in this case a salad, I immediately felt the drain of energy that it takes to digest food. We do not realize how much energy is expended by our bodies just to digest the food we eat. I felt it immediately.
I know many people think they couldn’t do this cleanse because of the idea of not eating. I say that if I can do it, anyone can. I love food. It’s one of my pleasures. I look forward to food. Doing this cleanse shows me that I can accomplish anything I put mind to. It’s not only physically healthy, it is also empowering. One of the things I find so remarkable when I’m doing these cleanses is the fact that we really don’t need much food to survive. I’ve read that having a calorie-restrictive diet can increase a person’s life by at least 10 years. Doing a cleanse can help kick-start a lifestyle of fewer calories.
Doing a Master Cleanse allows you to absorb more nutrients than you probably had in years. The mucus-forming foods we eat cause a barrier between the lining of the colon and the food that passes through. This means that fewer nutrients are actually absorbed into the bloodstream. After cleansing, and before you recreate that mucus lining, you are able to absorb much more nutrients. The way I see it is that you have a clean slate to work with. It’s a way to be removed from, what I see, as a “food-addiction”. I feel that many Americans today are obese and overindulge because of a food addiction. Doing a Master Cleanse removes you from that and allows you to see that we do not have to be what we eat. It allows for clarity of mind that we wouldn’t typically have.
I have turned many people on to this and have gotten excellent feedback. What I recommend to people is that if they really are interested in doing this cleanse for their health they read both books on the subject. Without reading these books they will almost certainly fail. It is absolutely necessary to understand exactly what you’re getting yourself into and what to expect. But I feel that once you know, and once you’ve tried it you will be able to continue a path of health and pursue future cleanses with very little effort. I try to do one at least once a year. I do have to plan my life around them so I try to plan them for a time of year that I can dedicate at least a month of healthy eating including the two weeks required to do the cleanse and to break it.
Finally, I'd like to wrap up my blog on The Master Cleanse by discussing some of the amazing benefits that I've experienced from doing this cleanse:
Clear skin - this cleanse was actually quite noticeable. I don't have the nicest complexion - never have - but I'm enjoying a clear, bright complexion after this cleanse.
More energy - as I mentioned before, toward the end of the cleanse I had quite a bit of energy but sticking to a healthy diet after the cleanse allows for much of that energy to continue.
Clarity of mind - Even the bible talks about how fasting allows the spirit to rise above the flesh. I always find it amazing how clear my mind is and how much it makes me realize that food can be a hindrance to our thinking. I'm not just referring to the lack of proper nutrition from our foods or even the distraction that comes with always thinking of your next meal, but the simple act of not eating for 10 days clears your mind and helps you focus on other important things.
Emotional detox - With every cleanse I do I seem to be happier. The emotional detox on this, my 5th cleanse, was not nearly as bad as the first. I recall my first cleanse. I was a pill for at least 3 of the the 10 days...and this is a recurring theme among people that do the cleanse; my best friend has done a couple of these and her husband never fails to mention her moods. I know some people might attribute this to "not eating". I know I tend to get cranky when I'm hungry. But this is not the case during the cleanse. As well as detoxing from all the toxins within your body, you're also detoxing from toxins in your brain. Naturally, when you're releasing toxins you're going to feel those symptoms. Interestingly, I heard on the John Tesh Radio Show yesterday that a test was conducted on the tears of people who were crying over emotional reasons versus those that were crying due to exposure to onions. The emotional tears showed toxic stress hormones while those from onions showed none. Clearly crying is our bodies' way of ridding ourselves of harmful stress hormones and toxins. During the cleanse, these are being released in a variety of ways - sometimes tears, sometimes waste, and sometimes through saliva. Our bodies are so amazing. Not only were we given the ability to heal ourselves naturally (think of the way a cut heals by creating a clot, then a scab, and then a renews the skin) but also to remove harmful toxins from our bodies. Our sweat glands, lymphatic glands, tear ducts, and even saliva are ways to remove toxins from our bodies. Since I've been cleansing, I am a much happier person in general. There's a popular "healer" that lives in my area and we run into him every once in a while. He noticed that the last time he saw me I wasn't stressed out at all. The first time he saw me he saw the aura of stress. Clearly these natural things are working!
And last, but definitely not least is the weight loss. This cleanse I lost right around 10 pounds and, thankfully, due to breaking the cleanse gently and staying off meat and alcohol (which I will continue to do for at least another 3 weeks...and then moderately after that) among other "bad" things, I'm keeping it off. I don't have to tout the benefits of weight loss but one thing both my boyfriend and I feel is a huge benefit is being lighter and being able to exercise more easily. My little dog weighs ten pounds so to make a point, after the cleanse, I picked her up and started walking around with her. I told my boyfriend..."This is how much more weight I'd been carrying around." It doesn't "sound" like much, but if you're not at your ideal weight I challenge you to try this, find something that weighs ten pounds and walk around with it even just for five minutes. I think you'll find that it is much more difficult than without it. We don't realize how much even a little extra weight means to our bodies - joints, muscles, ligaments, and even brain will thank you for it.
Here's to health, being clean, losing your excess weight,and being happy!!
Have a great week!
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Treating Mental Disorders Naturally
In last week’s blog I discussed the side effects of two medications, Zyprexa and Effexor. These medications are prescribed for various mental disorders such as schizophrenia, depression, bipolar disorder, and anxiety. Today I want to discuss the natural alternatives out there for treating these disorders.
It has always seemed to be thought that schizophrenia is incurable – at least I always thought so based on my own observations and the word from pharmaceutical companies. It appears that this isn’t so. A book called Natural Healing for Schizophrenia and other mental disorders by Eva Edelman discusses various mental disorders including autism, learning disabilities, depression, fatigue and schizophrenia. The book talks about the role of histamine, copper/zinc balance, over and under-methylation, allergies, physical illness, mercury and other heavy metals to name a few. She quotes the works of MDs and PhDs that are experts in the field. The book covers the various nutrients and minerals (which include copper, zinc, magnesium, amino acids, folic acid & B12, essential fats, minerals and electrolytes, vitamins A, B6, C and D) that can help battle the above-mentioned disorders. She also discusses how nutrient deficiencies can cause other health problems such as candida and systemic lupus, which would make sense considering that most, if not all issues facing Americans today are a direct result of their diets and/or lack of the proper nutrition.
One of the people quoted in Eva Edelman’s book is Dr. Abram Hoffer. He states that schizophrenia could be cured by large amounts of...
Read More...
It has always seemed to be thought that schizophrenia is incurable – at least I always thought so based on my own observations and the word from pharmaceutical companies. It appears that this isn’t so. A book called Natural Healing for Schizophrenia and other mental disorders by Eva Edelman discusses various mental disorders including autism, learning disabilities, depression, fatigue and schizophrenia. The book talks about the role of histamine, copper/zinc balance, over and under-methylation, allergies, physical illness, mercury and other heavy metals to name a few. She quotes the works of MDs and PhDs that are experts in the field. The book covers the various nutrients and minerals (which include copper, zinc, magnesium, amino acids, folic acid & B12, essential fats, minerals and electrolytes, vitamins A, B6, C and D) that can help battle the above-mentioned disorders. She also discusses how nutrient deficiencies can cause other health problems such as candida and systemic lupus, which would make sense considering that most, if not all issues facing Americans today are a direct result of their diets and/or lack of the proper nutrition.
One of the people quoted in Eva Edelman’s book is Dr. Abram Hoffer. He states that schizophrenia could be cured by large amounts of...
Read More...
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Zyprexa and Effexor
Could your antidepressants and anti-anxiety medications be seriously damaging your organs? Read on to learn about two of the medications prescribed for depression and anxiety – Zyprexa and Effexor to understand the importance of understanding "side effects" and other issues related to long-term use of these drugs.
Zyprexa,
also know as olanzipine generically, is an “atypical antipsychotic
drug” used to typically treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and
symptoms of dementia. Effexor, also known as venlafaxine generically, is
in a class of drugs called selective serotonin and norepinephrine
reuptake inhibitors (SSNRIs) and is used to treat depression, anxiety,
and panic and sleep disorders.
Considering that my mother had been
on these medications for over a decade, chances are that she has
symptoms of side effects. It is my belief that these are the cause of
her kidney problems or, at the very least, have exacerbated the
problems, as there is nothing else that might point to why she would
have developed CKD (Chronic Kidney Disease).
Side effects of any
drugs can be readily found online, particularly straight from the
manufacturer. To give you an idea of the damage these drugs can cause,
the following are some of the “severe” side effects: Severe allergic
reactions (rash; hives; itching; difficulty breathing; tightness in the
chest; swelling of the mouth, face, lips, or tongue; unusual
hoarseness); abnormal thoughts; chest pain; confusion; decreased
urination; fainting; fast, slow, or irregular heartbeat; fever, chills,
or persistent sore throat; increased saliva production or drooling;
increased sweating; memory loss; menstrual changes; muscle pain,
weakness, or stiffness; new or worsening mental or mood changes (e.g.
depression, hallucinations); seizures; severe or prolonged dizziness or
headache; shortness of breath; suicidal thoughts or actions; swelling of
the hands, legs, or feet; symptoms of high blood sugar (e.g. increased
thirst, hunger, urination; unusual weakness), and the list goes on and
on.
For the purposes of this post, I am going to focus on the side effects
that seem to cause kidney issues. First of all, based on the information
for professionals, which can be found at http://www.drugs.com/sfx/zyprexa-side-effects.html,
there was an increased incidence of dry mouth in patients using
olanzapine versus placebo. Anytime there is an increase in dry mouth it
means the body actually requires water. The body is actually becoming
dehydrated; it’s not just a “side effect”. When asking many people with
this condition about it, their answer is typically, “my medication does
it to me” and therefore they believe that is the issue and never
actually increase their water intake.
The book, "Your Body's Many Cries for Water," addresses the very issue of how dehydration causes a great many illnesses. Another article, which can be found at http://www.naturalnews.com/023441_water_pain_dehydration.html,
also discusses how, in many cases of illness, the cure is water. Many
illnesses are mistaken for dehydration and most people could actually be
“cured” simply by drinking water; however, this is not a common prescription. Doctors
usually reach to their prescription pad before really even looking into
the problem.
I have witnessed first hand that many doctors do not
"prescribe" something as simple as water and actually imply that a lack
of water does not cause any kind of illness. What many doctors who do
this are inadvertently doing is discouraging their patients from
drinking water, despite its being vital to all of our bodies' processes.
Because of my own experiences with conventional doctors, namely in that
they would rather prescribe a remedy for a symptom without looking to
the root of the cause and prescribing a remedy or remedies for the
patient I only see conventional doctors when absolutely necessary. I do
believe they have a place in our medical system, but not to the extent
that they do right now. Or else, these doctors should incorporate
homeopathic and naturopathic treatments with their conventional
treatments. Such doctors exist but they are few and far between.
So,
number one, I believe kidneys could become very taxed simply because of
not getting enough water. Additionally, patients who take such
medications becoming more dehydrated from the medication itself causing
their her kidneys to worsen.
Two other side effects, which can be found at http://www.prozactruth.com/zyprexa.htm
are Acute Renal Failure (the kidneys stop functioning properly to
excrete wastes) and an increase in hepatic enzymes (the amount of paired
liver proteins that regulate liver processes causing a condition where
the liver functions abnormally). Of course this Acute Renal Failure is
different than Chronic Kidney Disease in that the former can be "fixed"
and the kidney function could return to normal. Common sense tells us,
however, that any kind of kidney failure would obviously affect their
health over the long term.
Many "official" web pages state that caution should be used when prescribing Zyprexa in:...
Read More (This blog has been moved to Nature's Presence, Are Antidepressants Destroying Your Organs?)
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Kidney Problems and the Effects of Antidepressants
For
the past two years my mother has been having kidney problems. Her
kidneys have been functioning only at 25%. The only real advice her
doctors (primary care and nephrologist) have given her is to reduce her
sodium intake. She understands the need to do whatever it takes to get
her kidneys functioning properly so she has done a very good job at
reducing her sodium intake.
What
I found odd was that neither of her doctors recommended that she drink
more water – you know that pure fluid that our kidneys require to flush
out all those pesky toxins we ingest every single day? No, her doctor
told her that drinking more water would not necessarily help get her
creatinine to an ideal level.
For
years we have been telling my mom that she needs to drink more water.
We visibly see her dry mouth – which, she claims is a result of her
medications. "All the MORE reason to drink more water," we tell her. It
was very frustrating to know that her doctor, in whom she has placed
much trust, would give her this kind of information. Although she has
tried to drink more water since we have explained that it is indeed
important for optimal kidney function – regardless of what her doctor
says – I felt like that was a huge step back in our quest to help her
see where she could do something so simple to improve her health.
My
mother has a tendency for stubbornness. I’ve been telling her for years
that she needs to take supplements because we just don’t get the proper
nutrition from the food we eat. Due to the over-processing of food as
well as all the pesticides used on our “fresh” produce our food is just
not very nutritious. She disagreed with me again, of course. She
believes that she eats just fine, thank you very much. She’s set in her
ways, what can I say?
She’s
been seeing her nephrologist every six months at which time she goes
over my mother’s blood test results with her and tells her at what
percentage her kidneys are functioning. I decided that I should go with
her to her last appointment to hear the latest verdict. It turned out
that her kidney function had dropped, yet again. I sat there listening
to the doctor asking questions…and checking my mom’s legs. I watched as
the nephrologist took a phone call on her cell phone during my mom’s
visit. I also saw her check the phone a second time at which point I was
prepared to say something to her had she taken the call. She then asked
my mom again, the same question…and checked my mom’s legs for
swelling…again. Had she forgotten she’d already done it? She then said
that there was a note from my mom’s regular doctor that stated that her
liver enzymes were high now so she wanted my mom to have another blood
test and go back to see her in two months.
That
was about the gist of the appointment. Had it not been for the liver
count, my mom would have made an appointment for 6 months out and that
would have been that. Additionally (more of an aside), her blood
pressure was up. The doctor recommended that my mother have her blood
pressure checked over the next couple of weeks and if it showed her
blood pressure to be high, she would recommend a medication to lower it.
Meanwhile
I apparently forgot that I was actually able to speak. The only useful
thing that came out of my mouth was “Can I have a copy of the blood test
results?” which she “allowed” me to have. I got the copy and we left.
A
couple of days later I started thinking, “What the heck was wrong with
me? Why didn’t I say something about the phone call…or ask what her real
purpose was? Was she just monitoring my mom’s creatinine levels until
her kidney function got so low that she had to go on dialysis?” She had
absolutely no useful information to help my mom get better. This is when
I decided that I needed to take matters into my own hands. I took a
copy of the blood test results to my chiropractor who had been treating
my mom. I also wanted to try and figure out what was causing the kidney
problems in the first place.
After
looking at the blood test results, it became clear that much of the
problem was likely the medication she had been on for over a decade. It
is no secret that, for the most part, conventional doctors only look at
whether or not levels are within the accepted range. They rarely, if
ever, look at what the implications of other issues might be; it doesn’t
really matter if they’re on the cusp. They also typically only look at
each issue separately and not how they may contribute to the main
problem or be part of the same problem.
For
example, the results of her test showed that while her blood sugar was...
Also, please find the follow up blog regarding specific information about Zyprexa and Effexor by clicking here: "Are Antidepressants Destroying Your Organs?"
Sunday, January 31, 2010
My Mom Suggested It
So, here I am FINALLY writing a blog. I am happy to say that it was my 74 year-old mother that suggested I do this. I didn't even know she knew what a blog was! She claims to know nothing about computers, let alone the web. It was a great idea though. The reason she suggested it is because I am determined to make her healthy...if it's the last thing I do.
Here's how it's going to go: as time permits I plan on writing about natural healing. This information will come from research I've done or articles I have read and I'm hoping to compile it into a simple format - for the average person to understand. My focus is going to be on pharmaceutical drugs, their harmful side effects, interactions, contribution to nutrient deficiency and natural alternatives.
Once I get into the pharmaceutical topics, I will give my mom's story first and then you'll know why she even made the suggestion. But this week I want to start the story of how I discovered natural health.
It all started around four years ago when my beloved cousin, who had begun a vegan lifestyle and was already well-versed in eating organic, talked to me about The Master Cleanse, or "The Lemonade Diet". She told me the story about how a local businesswoman (her business is now to promote natural health) had once been very sickly. She was a young lady with rheumatoid arthritis as well as other problems. As a result of the arthritis her fingers had already begun to curl. She came across information on the cleanse and decided to read more about it and subsequently try it. To make a long story short, this lady decided to get rid of all the junk food in her house and made a vow to only eat healthy. She ultimately cured herself of the arthritis and is now teaching yoga as well as consulting in natural health. The other story my cousin told was of a man that had gallbladder problems. He'd been to numerous doctors and all told him the same thing - his gallbladder would have to be removed. He told the doctors (in so many words) "Um, I think I'll keep my gallbladder. I'm assuming that it's there for a reason.." Instead this man chose to seek out alternative healing. He too found the cleanse and ultimately through cleansing and diet he rid himself of his gallbladder problems.
At this point, after hearing about these things, I decided it was worth my looking into. I purchased the two books about the cleanse (which you can find reference to at my web site http://www.marciemartinez.ws/Health) and found the information so fascinating and it made so much sense to me (and my boyfriend) that we both decided to try it early the next year. One of the things that is required to do a successful cleanse is to cease ingesting or, in any case, subjecting one's body to outside toxins (as long as it can be helped). This meant that I was going to have to get off my allergy medication - I was on Claritin and Rhinocort because I'd had miserable allergies for years; I was on Protonix for my acid reflux; and I was on antidepressants (from having gone through a divorce...I continued taking them for about a year). These, I knew, were fairly major toxins and so I got off all of them - cold turkey - because I wanted to do a successful cleanse. In addition (side note) I ensured that all products I was using during the cleanse were all natural - natural lotions, shampoos, toothpaste, etc. so that my body could take a complete break from dealing with all those toxins.
It was a successful cleanse. I cleared myself of acid reflux (for a while....I'll discuss this in a later blog), I cleared myself of allergies (again, for a short while...but subsequently got cured of those naturally...also for another blog) and I no longer needed antidepressants (I actually think I never really needed them, they were just a knee-jerk reaction from my doctor because I was bawling in his office, but I digress).
There's more to it obviously but the gist of it is that after discovering the cleanse and reading a lot about natural health, while I was on the cleanse, I was convinced that natural was the way to go. I have changed many of my methods of cooking, cooking products, food, etc. but that's not really what this blog is about. It may evolve into that later but I'm going to keep it to the blog my mom envisioned as closely as possible.
Now you know a little bit about why I believe in this. Next blog I'll talk about what I'm doing for my mom.
Until then, have a great week!
Here's how it's going to go: as time permits I plan on writing about natural healing. This information will come from research I've done or articles I have read and I'm hoping to compile it into a simple format - for the average person to understand. My focus is going to be on pharmaceutical drugs, their harmful side effects, interactions, contribution to nutrient deficiency and natural alternatives.
Once I get into the pharmaceutical topics, I will give my mom's story first and then you'll know why she even made the suggestion. But this week I want to start the story of how I discovered natural health.
It all started around four years ago when my beloved cousin, who had begun a vegan lifestyle and was already well-versed in eating organic, talked to me about The Master Cleanse, or "The Lemonade Diet". She told me the story about how a local businesswoman (her business is now to promote natural health) had once been very sickly. She was a young lady with rheumatoid arthritis as well as other problems. As a result of the arthritis her fingers had already begun to curl. She came across information on the cleanse and decided to read more about it and subsequently try it. To make a long story short, this lady decided to get rid of all the junk food in her house and made a vow to only eat healthy. She ultimately cured herself of the arthritis and is now teaching yoga as well as consulting in natural health. The other story my cousin told was of a man that had gallbladder problems. He'd been to numerous doctors and all told him the same thing - his gallbladder would have to be removed. He told the doctors (in so many words) "Um, I think I'll keep my gallbladder. I'm assuming that it's there for a reason.." Instead this man chose to seek out alternative healing. He too found the cleanse and ultimately through cleansing and diet he rid himself of his gallbladder problems.
At this point, after hearing about these things, I decided it was worth my looking into. I purchased the two books about the cleanse (which you can find reference to at my web site http://www.marciemartinez.ws/Health) and found the information so fascinating and it made so much sense to me (and my boyfriend) that we both decided to try it early the next year. One of the things that is required to do a successful cleanse is to cease ingesting or, in any case, subjecting one's body to outside toxins (as long as it can be helped). This meant that I was going to have to get off my allergy medication - I was on Claritin and Rhinocort because I'd had miserable allergies for years; I was on Protonix for my acid reflux; and I was on antidepressants (from having gone through a divorce...I continued taking them for about a year). These, I knew, were fairly major toxins and so I got off all of them - cold turkey - because I wanted to do a successful cleanse. In addition (side note) I ensured that all products I was using during the cleanse were all natural - natural lotions, shampoos, toothpaste, etc. so that my body could take a complete break from dealing with all those toxins.
It was a successful cleanse. I cleared myself of acid reflux (for a while....I'll discuss this in a later blog), I cleared myself of allergies (again, for a short while...but subsequently got cured of those naturally...also for another blog) and I no longer needed antidepressants (I actually think I never really needed them, they were just a knee-jerk reaction from my doctor because I was bawling in his office, but I digress).
There's more to it obviously but the gist of it is that after discovering the cleanse and reading a lot about natural health, while I was on the cleanse, I was convinced that natural was the way to go. I have changed many of my methods of cooking, cooking products, food, etc. but that's not really what this blog is about. It may evolve into that later but I'm going to keep it to the blog my mom envisioned as closely as possible.
Now you know a little bit about why I believe in this. Next blog I'll talk about what I'm doing for my mom.
Until then, have a great week!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)